The Core i9-13900 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8370 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $312.26 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-13900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8370
- Up to 66% cheaper – $163.06 vs $475.32
Core i9-13900 vs FX-8370 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, €
€475.32
34%
Value, €/FPS
€2.21/FPS
44%
Core i9-13900 vs FX-8370 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900 vs FX-8370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900 vs FX-8370 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
