The Core i9-13900 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4300, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $432.06 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-13900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4300
- Up to 91% cheaper – $43.26 vs $475.32
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i9-13900 vs FX-4300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, €
€475.32
9%
Value, €/FPS
€2.21/FPS
11%
Core i9-13900 vs FX-4300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900 vs FX-4300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900 vs FX-4300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $549.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
