Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 and the cheaper Core i3-13100 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-13100 - 216 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-13100
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $112.60 vs $452.07
- Up to 74% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900 - $0.55 vs $2.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 60 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €452.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6090 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€112.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €112.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6090 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900 | vs | Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |