Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 327 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $225.14 vs $405.40
- Up to 42% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900KF - $1.06 vs $1.83 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900KF - 222 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 32 vs 24 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
212
95%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€225.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €225.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 366 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
58%
Price, €
€405.4
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €405.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 366 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900KF | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |