Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 5600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 5600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 106 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 5600.
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 5600 - 524 vs 451 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $104.26 vs $324.32
- Up to 63% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-12900F - $0.23 vs $0.62 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
524
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
37%
Price, €
€324.32
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €324.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6420 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
451
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€104.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €104.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6421 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900F | vs | Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |