Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 734 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900F.
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $324.30 vs $517.79
- Up to 35% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-14900 - $0.82 vs $1.26 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i9-12900F - 411 vs 394 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
394
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€324.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €324.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 391 minutes ago
Buy for €517.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 391 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900F | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |