Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 3700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X.
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 7 3700X - 271 vs 250 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $104.94 vs $242.68
- Up to 53% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-11900K - $0.47 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
271
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
47%
Price, €
€269.37
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €269.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
250
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€116.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €116.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900K | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |