The Core i9-11900 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320E and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $109.88 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-11900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Up to 41% cheaper – $160.38 vs $270.26
Core i9-11900 vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-11900
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
202
100%
Min 1% FPS
133
100%
Price, €
€270.26
59%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
72%
Core i9-11900 vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-11900 vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-11900 vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-11900
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-11900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| $439.00 | MSRP | $147.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
