Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 53% better in League of Legends than Core i5-10400F - 262 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $135.09 vs $270.26
- Up to 23% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i9-11900 - $0.79 vs $1.03 per FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
262
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
77%
Price, €
€270.26
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €270.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 405 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
171
65%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€135.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €135.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 404 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900 | vs | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |