Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 747 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 28% better in Starfield than Core i9-10900X - 78 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $230.09 vs $458.57
- Up to 61% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10900X - $3.27 vs $8.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €509.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
78
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €255.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900X | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |