Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $237.46 vs $405.94
- Up to 40% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-13900K - $0.94 vs $1.56 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i9-10900KF - 289 vs 281 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
281
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€263.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €263.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
60%
Price, €
€450.59
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €450.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900KF | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |