Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 189 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - 203 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $309.90 vs $423.38
- Up to 30% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - $1.53 vs $2.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 32 vs 20 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €423.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6832 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€309.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €309.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6832 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900K | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |