The Core i9-10900K is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-9370 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $281.96 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-10900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-9370
- Up to 60% cheaper – $191.01 vs $472.97
Core i9-10900K vs FX-9370 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
194
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, €
€472.97
40%
Value, €/FPS
€2.43/FPS
47%
Core i9-10900K vs FX-9370 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900K vs FX-9370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900K vs FX-9370 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-10900K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| $547.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
125 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
20 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
