Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1348 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i9-10900K - 234 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $133.91 vs $381.42
- Up to 66% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i9-10900K - $0.64 vs $1.91 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €423.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 780 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 779 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900K | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |