Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $426.10 vs $730.45
- Up to 39% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-13400F - $3.78 vs $6.24 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 4% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-10900K - 130 vs 125 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
96%
Value, €/FPS
€3.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€472.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €472.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |