In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 9 3900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900
- Up to 1% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 3900X
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900 vs Ryzen 9 3900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900 vs Ryzen 9 3900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900 vs Ryzen 9 3900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
83%
L3 Cache
20 MB
31%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 3900X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$483.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM4 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
