Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Core i7-9700F
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $230.63 vs $341.19
- Up to 16% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 7900X - $2.12 vs $2.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 24% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-9700F - 135 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
109
81%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€230.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €230.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6855 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.53/FPS
84%
Price, €
€341.19
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for €341.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6854 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700F | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |