The Core i7-9700F is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $183.77 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-9700F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 80% cheaper – $46.86 vs $230.63
- A better value for money for gaming
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-9700F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-9700F vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
190
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, €
€230.63
20%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
23%
Core i7-9700F vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700F vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700F vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-9700F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| $333.00 | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
