Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4237 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 55 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 51% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-940XM - 664 vs 440 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
664
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7384 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-940XM | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |