Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-930.
Advantages of Core i7-930
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $117.67 vs $351.43
- Up to 42% better value when playing New World than Core i9-14900K - $1.35 vs $2.34 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 72% better in New World than Core i7-930 - 167 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-930 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-930 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
FPS
97
58%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€130.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €130.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
58%
Price, €
€390.09
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-930 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 28th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |