Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4693 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-930.
Advantages of Core i7-930
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $130.61 vs $765.76
- Up to 80% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i5-13400F - $0.29 vs $1.45 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 17% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i7-930 - 527 vs 449 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-930 - 16 vs 8 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
FPS
449
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€130.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €130.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6942 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
527
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.45/FPS
20%
Price, €
€765.76
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6942 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-930 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 28th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |