Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i7-8809G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1798 days newer than Core i7-8809G.
Advantages of Core i7-8809G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 34% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-8809G - 488 vs 364 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8809G - 16 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
488
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€765.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8464 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-8809G | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake G | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon RX Vega M GH | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |