The Core i7-875K is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-1620 v4 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $52.35 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-875K
- Up to 25% cheaper – $156.77 vs $209.12
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of the Xeon E5-1620 v4
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i7-875K vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
168
93%
Min 1% FPS
113
94%
Price, €
€156.77
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, €
€209.12
74%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
80%
Core i7-875K vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-875K vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-875K vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
2.93 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
56%
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-875K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
$353.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
95 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |