Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 948 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-8700T.
Advantages of Core i7-8700T
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $146.53 vs $279.19
- Up to 41% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 5950X - $1.25 vs $2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-8700T - 146 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700T - 32 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
130
89%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €162.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Buy for €309.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-8700T | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |