The Core i7-8700T is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10320 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $36.94 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-8700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i3-10320
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 27% cheaper – $98.19 vs $135.13
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-10320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
184
97%
Min 1% FPS
122
98%
Price, €
€135.13
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
70%
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, €
€98.19
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-10320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-10320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-10320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-8700T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |