The Core i7-8700K is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-11900, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $130.52 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-8700K
- Up to 46% cheaper – $153.15 vs $283.67
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i9-11900
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
Core i7-8700K vs Core i9-11900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
209
94%
Min 1% FPS
145
95%
Price, €
€153.15
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Core i9-11900
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
223
100%
Min 1% FPS
153
100%
Price, €
€283.67
53%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
57%
Core i7-8700K vs Core i9-11900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700K vs Core i9-11900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700K vs Core i9-11900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i9-11900
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-8700K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$3.59 | MSRP | $4.39 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |