Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-8700K.
Advantages of Core i7-8700K
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $148.30 vs $765.76
- Up to 79% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-13400F - $1.28 vs $6.03 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-8700K - 127 vs 116 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
116
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7267 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.03/FPS
21%
Price, €
€765.76
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7266 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-8700K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |