In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-8700K is slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-8700K
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 29% faster in Battlefield 6 – 106 vs 82 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700K vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
82 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
77%
Price, $
$194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700K vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700K vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700K
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
98%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700K Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $359.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
