In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-820QM is slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 45 vs 250 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Up to 25% faster in Battlefield 6 – 76 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 8 days newer – Oct 02, 2018 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 9 years and 8 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-820QM vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Oct 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$894.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-820QM vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-820QM vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-820QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.733 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
3.067 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
45%
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Oct 2nd, 2018
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-820QM Sep 23rd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Oct 2nd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Released | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
$546.00 | MSRP | $1,299.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | SP3r2 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
None | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
