Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Core i7-7700T
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $125.23 vs $229.73
- Up to 10% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-14700F - $0.37 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 65% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-7700T - 558 vs 339 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 28 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
339
61%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€125.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €125.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 347 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
558
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
90%
Price, €
€229.73
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €229.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 345 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7700T | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |