Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Core i7-7700
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $123.67 vs $671.13
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.94 vs $4.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 23% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-7700 - 161 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
131
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €123.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7122 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.17/FPS
23%
Price, €
€671.13
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7121 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7700 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |