Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Core i7-7700
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $126.13 vs $148.64
- Up to 6% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-14400F - $0.30 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-7700 - 461 vs 414 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
414
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €126.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
461
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
94%
Price, €
€148.64
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for €148.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7700 | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |