In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-6950X is quite a bit faster than the Xeon E5-2699A v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-6950X
- Up to 25% faster in Battlefield 6 – 79 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 3% less energy – 140 vs 145 Watts
- Consumes up to 3% less energy
Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Is 4 months and 25 days newer – Oct 25, 2016 vs May 31, 2016
- Is 4 months and 25 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-6950X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
63 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
80%
Price, $
$1078.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.12/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6950X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6950X vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6950X
May 31st, 2016
Cores
10-core
45%
L3 Cache
25 MB
45%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6950X May 31st, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 Oct 25th, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2016 | Released | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$1,723.00 | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
140 W | Power Consumption | 145 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
