Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2409 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Core i7-6950X
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $530.52 vs $765.76
- Up to 24% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-13400F - $2.67 vs $3.53 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Valheim than Core i7-6950X - 217 vs 199 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
199
92%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€530.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €530.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7429 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.53/FPS
76%
Price, €
€765.76
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7427 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6950X | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |