Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 2044 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Core i7-6900K
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $99.02 vs $105.50
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 10% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i7-6900K - 238 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i7-6900K - $0.49 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for €109.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
238
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.11
93%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €117.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6900K | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |