Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Core i7-6700T
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $69.79 vs $76.29
- Up to 5% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.19 vs $0.20 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-6700T - 424 vs 404 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
404
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
Buy for €84.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 289 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700T | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |