The Core i7-6700T is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4130 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $33.39 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-6700T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 42% cheaper – $46.86 vs $80.25
Core i7-6700T vs FX-4130 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, €
€80.25
58%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
64%
Core i7-6700T vs FX-4130 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700T vs FX-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700T vs FX-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
87%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6700T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | $112.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
