The Core i7-6700K is a much faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-4670, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $46.85 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-6700K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-4670
- Up to 38% cheaper – $76.93 vs $123.78
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 84 vs 91 Watts
Core i7-6700K vs Core i5-4670 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Average FPS
188
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, €
€123.78
62%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
65%
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
182
97%
Min 1% FPS
121
98%
Price, €
€76.93
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Core i7-6700K vs Core i5-4670 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6700K vs Core i5-4670 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6700K vs Core i5-4670 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6700K
Aug 5th, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6700K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
$339.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
91 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |