In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-620M is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 5700X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 35 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Up to 97% faster in Battlefield 6 – 120 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 97% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 14 years newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 14 years newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-620M vs Ryzen 7 5700X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Ryzen 7 5700X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Ryzen 7 5700X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
4%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
33%
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
96 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5700X3D Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AM4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
