The Core i7-620LM is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the FX-8320E. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-620LM
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 25 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i7-620LM vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
166
99%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, €
€160.38
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
100%
Core i7-620LM vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620LM vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620LM vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
57%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-620LM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| $300.00 | MSRP | $147.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
25 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
