The Core i7-620LM is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-3770K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-620LM
- Consumes up to 68% less energy – 25 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-3770K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i7-620LM vs Core i7-3770K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
166
97%
Min 1% FPS
112
97%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
172
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, €
€176.88
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Core i7-620LM vs Core i7-3770K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i7-3770K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i7-3770K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
67%
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-620LM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-3770K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
$300.00 | MSRP | $313.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
25 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
