The Core i7-620LM is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-2400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-620LM
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 25 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-2400
- A much faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-620LM vs Core i5-2400 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
166
98%
Min 1% FPS
112
99%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-2400
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
169
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, €
€97.93
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Core i7-620LM vs Core i5-2400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i5-2400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i5-2400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Core i5-2400
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-620LM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| $300.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
25 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
