In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-5930K is slightly faster than the Ryzen 3 1200. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $89 more expensive!
Core i7-5930K
- Up to 7% faster in Battlefield 6 – 72 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Battlefield 6
Ryzen 3 1200
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer – Jul 27, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2014
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 53% cheaper – $79.98 vs $169.00
- Up to 53% cheaper
- Up to 49% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.19 vs $2.34/FPS
- Up to 49% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-5930K vs Ryzen 3 1200: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
72 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
100%
Price, $
$169
47%
Value, $/FPS
$2.34/FPS
51%
Ryzen 3 1200
Jul 27th, 2017
Average FPS
67 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
93%
Price, $
$79.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5930K vs Ryzen 3 1200 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5930K vs Ryzen 3 1200 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Ryzen 3 1200
Jul 27th, 2017
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
53%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5930K Sep 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 1200 Jul 27th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2014 | Released | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | AM4 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
