The Core i7-5930K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $403.54 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-5930K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 81% cheaper – $91.91 vs $495.45
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Core i7-5930K vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, €
€495.45
18%
Value, €/FPS
€2.72/FPS
20%
Core i7-5930K vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5930K vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5930K vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
53%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-5930K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Not Available | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Haswell E | Codename | Vishera |
140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
15 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |