In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-5930K is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $301 cheaper!
Core i7-5930K
- Up to 67% cheaper – $149.00 vs $449.98
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 61% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.09 vs $5.35/FPS
- Up to 61% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 140 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 18% faster in Battlefield 6 – 84 vs 71 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2014
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-5930K vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
71 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
84%
Price, $
$149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
84 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
63 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
33%
Value, $/FPS
$5.35/FPS
39%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5930K vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5930K vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
15 MB
78%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5930K Sep 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA2066 |
140W | Power Consumption | 165W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
