The Core i7-4820K is a much faster gaming CPU than the FX-8300, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $84.52 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-4820K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
Advantages of the FX-8300
- Up to 47% cheaper – $95.55 vs $180.07
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-4820K cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-4820K vs FX-8300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, €
€180.07
53%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
54%
Core i7-4820K vs FX-8300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4820K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Vishera |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
10 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
