Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4790 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4790 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4790.
Advantages of Core i7-4790
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $64.17 vs $730.45
- Up to 90% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13400F - $0.39 vs $3.94 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-4790 - 206 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
183
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4790 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |