The Core i7-4771 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-14700, however, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $187.17 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-4771
- Up to 58% cheaper – $133.35 vs $320.52
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i7-14700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 28 vs 8 threads
Core i7-4771 vs Core i7-14700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4771
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
182
85%
Min 1% FPS
121
86%
Price, €
€133.35
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, €
€320.52
41%
Value, €/FPS
€1.49/FPS
49%
Core i7-4771 vs Core i7-14700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4771 vs Core i7-14700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4771 vs Core i7-14700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4771
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i7-14700
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4771 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-14700 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$320.00 | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
84 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 33 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |