The Core i7-4770S is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-13700, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $228.92 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-4770S
- Up to 79% cheaper – $59.35 vs $288.27
- A much better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i7-13700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 8 threads
Core i7-4770S vs Core i7-13700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4770S
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
181
85%
Min 1% FPS
120
86%
Price, €
€59.35
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
213
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, €
€288.27
20%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
24%
Core i7-4770S vs Core i7-13700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4770S vs Core i7-13700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4770S vs Core i7-13700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4770S
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4770S | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$305.00 | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 30 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |