In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4765T is slower than the Core i7-10700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700KF
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6 – 87 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4765T vs Core i7-10700KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
66 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
49 FPS
75%
Price, $
$498.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.55/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i7-10700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i7-10700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i7-10700KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $303.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
