Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4765T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3503 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Core i7-4765T
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $321.70 vs $765.76
- Up to 54% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-13400F - $2.70 vs $5.89 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 9% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-4765T - 130 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 16 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
119
92%
Value, €/FPS
€2.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€321.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €321.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7304 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.89/FPS
46%
Price, €
€765.76
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7302 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4765T | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |